Analyzing Eye of the Tiger essays

Analyzing Eye of the Tiger essays Poets and song writers use different literary elements to embellish different aspects of the poem. Some use the elements to make the reader look at certain parts of the poem differently and others may use them to give a poem feeling. In Eye of the Tiger, Jim Petik uses imagery to compare the struggle of person to that of a tiger and also repetition to let the reader know that a person should never give up on their dreams. The song is written in ballad form, which also enhances the main idea of not giving up by showing the reader that dreams do come true. In the third stanza, Petik uses imagery to make the reader envision a tiger hunting its prey. The first two lines of the stanza Petik writes, Face to face, out in the heat. Hangin tough, stayin hungry. He is comparing the hardship of a person trying to reach his goals to that of a tiger hunting for food. In the last two lines of the stanza it says, Still we take to the streets, for the kill with the skill to survive. In those two lines, Petik combines the two different worlds using the word street referencing the person, and kill referencing the tiger. Eye of the Tiger is meant to be a motivating song; hence, Petik repeats certain lines making sure that, whoever the reader might be, they will have the strongest lines implanted into their mind. He repeats the refrain three different times throughout the song and the most important line in the refrain is, Its the eye of the tiger. The eye of the tiger is the look in someones eyes when they feel like theyre unstoppable. Petik repeats that same line four more times at the end of the song which gives the reader a lasting impression that he or she has the eye of the tiger. He also repeats the phrase risin up once at the beginning of the song, and then ag...

3 Sentences with Parenthetical-Phrase Punctuation Problems

3 Sentences with Parenthetical-Phrase Punctuation Problems 3 Sentences with Parenthetical-Phrase Punctuation Problems 3 Sentences with Parenthetical-Phrase Punctuation Problems By Mark Nichol In each of the sentences below, faulty punctuation confuses the syntactical organization. Discussions and revisions follow each problematic sentence. 1. Documentation, such as white papers, that support model choices, data analysis and other similar assertions, will be necessary to support the elections made. This sentence includes one parenthetical phrase (â€Å"such as white papers†), but it’s punctuated as if another, longer one is embedded after it. However, the segment of the sentence between that phrase and â€Å"will be necessary . . .† is not parenthetical, so no comma is necessary before will: â€Å"Documentation, such as white papers, that support model choices, data analysis and other similar assertions will be necessary to support the elections made.† 2. Presumptive Democratic presidential nominee, Hillary Clinton, faces consistent fire from people who oppose her policy positions, including Republican nominee, Donald Trump, and many others. There’s a subtle distinction between an appositive (a word or phrase equivalent in meaning with an adjacent word or phrase) and a simple description. The phrases preceding the names in this sentence are descriptions; simply precede each with the and they become appositives, which are set off parenthetically. But as written, this sentence requires only one comma- the one separating the subordinate clause (beginning with â€Å"as does† from the main clause): â€Å"Presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton faces consistent fire from people who oppose her policy positions, including Republican nominee Donald Trump and many others.† 3. Raucous protesters and supporters of Donald Trump violently confronted each other in California leading to twenty arrests as the Republican presidential contender brought his campaign to conservative Orange County. The subordinate clause in this sentence, beginning with â€Å"as the Republican presidential contender,† must be set off by a comma, but an additional comma is required before the parenthetical phrase â€Å"leading to twenty arrests.† The second comma does double duty closing off the parenthetical phrase and setting off the subordinate clause from the main clause: â€Å"Raucous protesters and supporters of Donald Trump violently confronted each other in California, leading to twenty arrests, as the Republican presidential contender brought his campaign to conservative Orange County.† (The second comma is required because the arrests occurred after, not concurrent with, Trump’s arrival.) Want to improve your English in five minutes a day? Get a subscription and start receiving our writing tips and exercises daily! Keep learning! Browse the Punctuation category, check our popular posts, or choose a related post below:25 Subordinating Conjunctions10 Techniques for More Precise Writing40 Words Beginning with "Para-"